Reeds gewist, hier de orginele text:
"Yeh, the thread got deleted again from XPS forum. I've never met such an arrogant person that tries to sell something in my life. He's treating existing customers, and potential customers as if it's their good luck to be able to buy something from him. And since they are so lucky, they should never raise any questions, no matter how obvious the lies about the system are.
That such a man was able to sell he's system, based on lies, to a company such as Graupner just blows my mind.
Well, at least my thread got the truth out of Mr Jim Drew. The system was never designed to jump to the next channel in case of trouble.
I'm so upset by the way he's deleting threads, not answering questions, and flat out lies, that I will file a formal complaint to the Swedish authoritys first thing tomorrow.
I urge everyone to do the same. The laws in Sweden are NOT "one of a kind". Close to all countrys have laws that states that the burden of proof lies with the manufacturer/agent of a product. They HAVE to provide proof that their product does what their marketing says.
I just can't belive that Mr Jim Drew has the stomac to actually go out to meetings, and meet people face to face, when he has been proven to lie about most everything.
Not even he's so called 3 college degrees at age 17 can be proven, since there's no records of that.
It's just as surprizing that RC-Groups allow such a company to keep their forum here. RC-Groups are a place for honnest people, that share a passion for this hobby. We now have proof, from mr Jim Drew himself that he has been lying about he's system all along.
I think i stayed civil in my posts in the XPS forum, giving XPS every chance to do the right thing before file a formal Complaint. The first answer given was
Quote Jim Drew
"We are not concerned about this, as we know how the system works."
Well, if things go like they usually goes after filing a complaint, we will know IF it works.
Sorry for the long post, i'm just mad right now."
En nog een:
Seeing that XPS will not provide proof of the claims for "intelligent frequency switching", I have contacted Graupner for clarification of the subject.
I have asked for proof of those claims.
According to the law in my country(Sweden), any claims from a manufacturer has to be proven to be correct. This is of course more important when safety issues are concerned. Either way, the burden of proof is on the manufacturer, not the customer.
The interesting part in this is that I don't have to be a customer to file a formal complaint to the authoritys.
Should Graupner fail to provide such evidence, that shows that the system in fact work as advertised, i will file a formal complaint to the authoritys here.
This could lead to two things;
1. Graupner/XPS shows how the system works, and that it in fact switch frequency if needed.
2. Graupner/XPS fails to show such evidence, and are then forced to remove any claims that says so.
On the second scenario, it will end up in court, with all that goes with that.
It should also force Graupner in Europe to take back all systems from customers that so choose.
I don't own an XPS/Graupner system, but I was close to buying one. The reason I take this one step further is that it seems like people are getting ripped off.
I do not like it when a good company(graupner) try to sell me something based on a lie. I could be wrong, and it's possble that the system works as advertised, but I'm yet to see any proof of that.
Let me say it again, In Sweden(and probably in all of Europe) it's the manufacturer that has the burden of proof. If you claim something, you HAVE to show that what you claim is true.
Since Mr Jim Drew clearly states that he's system works as advertised, this issue should be very, very, very easy to solve. Just show us that it works as advertised. Again, Graupner has to do this according the Swedish law. There are no "if", "or", or "butt" about it, they are bound by the law. After reading the US law, i know that's the same there, the burden of proof is on the manufacturer, not the customer.
So, Mr Jim Drew, no matter how you respond to this, the system will have to prove that it does what you say it will. You either show it here, or Graupner shows it in Swedish court.
The Swedish law works like this.
I don't have to take it to court my self.
There is a departement in Sweden that handles consumers rights, and they will take it to court.
I don't even have to file the complaint with my name, i can do it anonymously.
I DO think that they will take this to court, due to the fact that we are talking about a system where safety is a major concern, an r/c jet doing 500km/h running without radio control is quite dangerous.
I'm posting this in the XPS forum, because I think that XPS should have a fair chance of providing proof before I take it any further. If this post gets deletet, then I have to post similar information somewhere else, where it can't be deleted.
It's time to get the facts on the table, there has been to much "he said, you said" on this matter.
